Political debate allows Americans to compare viewpoints and evaluate candidates’ policies, plans and ideas. It is a central tool for informed citizenship, as well as an essential component of democracy and the democratic process.
The debate format has evolved from informal gatherings to structured events that play a critical role in influencing public opinion and policy decisions. While debates have a long history, they are still evolving and presenting challenges that demand new approaches and solutions.
The Working Group recommends a number of reforms to the way in which political debate is conducted. These include:
Changing How and Where Debates Happen
In the past, debates have often taken the form of Sunday show or other one-on-one interviews with journalists, a dynamic that creates a conflict between the moderator’s role as journalist and his or her responsibility to remain neutral in the face of the pressures of a live event. This can result in questions that advance a news agenda, rather than the public understanding of the candidates’ plans and positions on issues. It can also lead to candidates preparing for debates in the same way they prepare for interviews and debates with the press.
In addition, the Working Group finds that the selection of moderators often gives the appearance of being a marketing opportunity for a particular media outlet. While it is understandable that networks want to use debates to showcase their broadcasting talent and enhance their brands, this practice can make the process appear arbitrary and open to accusations of bias.
About the Author
